How often do errors made by a Trial Judge typically get discovered?

Errors made by a Trial Judge typically get discovered around 90% of the time due to several factors inherent in the judicial system. This high percentage can be attributed to the various levels of scrutiny that cases undergo following the initial trial. For instance, appeals often involve review by higher courts that meticulously examine the trial record for procedural or substantive errors.

Additionally, the legal framework includes numerous checks and balances, such as motions for reconsideration and appellate reviews, which allow for the identification and correction of judge-made errors. Legal professionals, including attorneys and appellate judges, are trained to recognize these mistakes, and their role in safeguarding the integrity of the legal process contributes to the high rate of discovered errors.

Other options reflect lower frequencies of error detection, which do not align with the established understanding of how judicial oversight works and the thoroughness involved in appeals and legal reviews. This context helps to paint a clearer picture of how meticulously the legal system investigates errors following a trial, ultimately leading to the conclusion that a 90% discovery rate is a reasonable expectation.