What must law enforcement have to arrest someone in their home according to Norris v. State?

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

Study effectively for the Arkansas Law Enforcement Training Academy Test. Utilize flashcards and multiple choice questions, complete with hints and explanations, to prepare thoroughly for your exam.

In Norris v. State, the court established that law enforcement officers can arrest a person in their home if they have exigent circumstances and consent. Exigent circumstances refer to situations where immediate action is necessary, such as the potential destruction of evidence, risk of harm to individuals, or a suspect escaping. This principle recognizes the need for law enforcement to act swiftly in urgent situations where waiting for a warrant could compromise public safety or the integrity of an investigation.

Consent is equally important, as it involves the permission of the occupant to enter and make the arrest. If an officer obtains consent from a resident, they are permitted to enter the home without a warrant. Thus, the combination of exigent circumstances and consent allows officers to act within the confines of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures while still addressing urgent law enforcement needs.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy